X PRIZE Foundation
Login / Register
Automotive X PRIZEArchon X PRIZE for GenomicsSpace
Spanish
Russian
French
German
Chinese
Korean
Japanese
Portugese
Italian

Lew Launch Option?


<< previous      |      >>

Announced progress with the ESA “Vega” Small Launch Vehicle is a very encouraging development. The big question, of course, is Launch Costs $$$. After learning that Ariane' s new “Small Payload” service would have a cost higher than a Falcon 1, for even a few kg satellite, I gave up hope for a meaningful offering from Europe.

(I still have higher hopes for India. Their multi satellite launch this spring shows they have the capability. With a commitment to a few affordable (possible subsidized) launches a year, India could capture the lead in small space systems development – drawing entrepreneurs from other countries – and add a strong entrepreneurial position in advanced spaceflight to their accomplishments in World Class Software!)

The future in innovative spaceflight is up for grabs. The US seems prepared to see our (hypothetical) lead in this technology go the way of so many others (offshore). In a way in looks just like it did for baby “Microsoft” and similar early computer efforts: They understood that they needed to find a way to deliver products at affordable prices (deferring profits when necessary), and provide service and performance which made their offerings irresistible, and build a "monopoly" for later profits.

Micro-Space would certainly use such a launch service for both prototype systems testing and even the competition launch, if the costs made sense!


Comments

Hello Richard: Alas, the

Hello Richard:

Alas, the U.S. Government is mired in bureacratic nonsense, and they are working (quite successfully) to obstruct the efforts of entrepreneurs from enterring the Space Race.

What an odd message our government is sending: on the one hand we hear endless stories of how the U.S. Government wants to cut spending for NASA and Space Exploration, and how they want to encourage private companies (like yours and mine) to work on sustainable commercial Space Technologies, while on the other hand they create and enforce laws that exist purely to prevent the commercialization of Space by private companies. Those same laws work to keep costs high and prevent innovation in the U.S. and by U.S. entities, all while the rest of the world passes us by.

We here in the U.S. need to seriously lobby our lawmakers (elected public servants) to make some radical policy changes, and thereby bring regulations in line with stated policies. Otherwise they are simply deceiving themselves as much as they deceive the public whom they purportedly serve.

Fred

--
Fred J. Bourgeois, III
Leader, Team FREDNET -- http://xprize.frednet.com/
The First and ONLY 100% Open Source Entrant for the Google Lunar X Prize
"Just because it isn't easy doesn't mean it isn't fun."